by Shaun Gallagher
from Modern Believing Vol 57:2 - April 2016


I review different conceptions of the self and how they are treated in neurophilosophy and neuroscience.  Although there are a number of neuroscientists who deny that there is such a thing as the self, or argue that the self is an illusion produced by brain processes, the conception of self they argue against is typically based on the notion of substance.  This is not the only way to think of the self. I try to show that a pluralist view, that conceives of self as a set or pattern of various aspects or factors, might provide neuroscience with a more precise concept of self and still offer some connection with certain traditional notions of soul or person.



You can read the full article on the Liverpool University Press website (subscription required) or join Modern Church and receive your own copy of our journal quarterly.